Continuous Monitoring
A one-time AI readiness assessment is out of date by the time you present it.
Most AI governance content still treats readiness as a survey you fill out once. Yours changes every time a policy, a vendor, or a person does, so the score has to be watched, not filed away.
Reassessment runs on a cadence you set, so each score reflects where you are now, with the real delta against the last one, not a fresh number with no history behind it.
Demo video coming soon
Cadence you set
Set the number of days between recommended reassessments for your organization, defaulting to 90 days if you don't change it.
Real per-dimension deltas
Each reassessment shows exactly which dimension moved, by how much, and in which direction, from your last real snapshot.
A real snapshot history
Readiness snapshots are stored over time, so trend and momentum are drawn from actual past assessments, never estimated backward.
Evidence decay is tracked
Evidence backing a score carries a freshness label (fresh, aging, stale) based on how long ago it was verified, so an old confirmation doesn't quietly keep counting as current.
Straight from the platform
See exactly how it works, step by step, below.
Product screenshots coming soon
How it works
1
A baseline snapshot is captured
The first assessment establishes a baseline readiness snapshot, timestamped and stored.
2
Cadence is set per organization
An admin sets how many days should pass between recommended reassessments, shown as a 'next reassess' date.
3
A new snapshot is captured on schedule
Running a reassessment captures a new snapshot against the same dimensions, without needing to rebuild the assessment from scratch.
4
Delta and decay are computed automatically
The system computes the change since the last snapshot per dimension, and separately flags evidence that's aged past its useful window.
See it in the platform
Readiness across reassessments · Illustrative
+9 vs. last quarter
+9 vs. last quarter
Frequently asked
Who this helps
The CTO
Sees which specific dimension improved or slipped since the last reassessment, instead of a single number with no history behind it.
The Compliance Head
Can show a regulator a real reassessment cadence and history, not a single point-in-time survey presented as still current.
The Board
Reviews momentum over multiple real reassessments rather than a static score that may already be out of date by the meeting.