Capacity Planning
Know if your team can absorb what you're planning, before the quarter proves you wrong.
Most roadmaps assume everyone has more hours than they do. That's the gap between a plan and a wish list, and it's usually invisible until the deadline passes.
Capacity planning checks your prioritized initiatives against the people actually available to run them, so a roadmap asking for more than your team can deliver gets flagged before it becomes a missed quarter.
Demo video coming soon
Skill coverage, not headcount
Checks whether an initiative's required skills are actually covered by the specific people assigned to it, not just whether enough people exist.
Key person risk, named
Flags real people spread across two or more active initiatives at once, by name, so a single point of failure is visible before it bites.
Bottleneck radar
Surfaces which team is holding the most open blockers across initiatives, so a concentration of stuck work doesn't stay hidden.
Directional, not a promise
The allocation estimate is clearly labeled as a directional ratio of team size to active work, not a precise resourcing calculation.
Straight from the platform
See exactly how it works, step by step, below.
Product screenshots coming soon
How it works
1
Skills and assignments are set
Admins tag required skills on initiatives and skills on team members, then assign real people to real initiatives.
2
Coverage is matched, not assumed
A skill only counts as covered when someone actually assigned to that initiative actually has that skill tagged.
3
Concentration is surfaced
People on multiple active initiatives and teams holding multiple open blockers are pulled out as named, specific risks.
4
The estimate updates as work changes
As initiatives are added, closed, or reassigned, the allocation estimate and bottleneck view reflect the current state.
See it in the platform
Allocation estimate · Illustrative
88
Eng
64
Compliance
71
Risk
82
Ops
82% of available capacity committed this quarter
Frequently asked
Who this helps
The CTO
Sees skill gaps and key-person concentration by name before committing to a roadmap the team can't actually staff.
The Compliance Head
Confirms that governance-critical initiatives have people with the right skills assigned, not just a headcount next to them.
The Board
Gets an honest, clearly-labeled read on whether committed work exceeds available capacity, instead of an optimistic roadmap with no capacity check behind it.